 |
| Fig 1 The constellation Orion. Also in
the field are Sirius (low down in trees) and Procyon top left.
Rigel appears the brightest star in the picture (bottom right).
Betelgeuse (Orion's right shoulder) forms an equilateral triangle
with Sirius and Procyon. This is known as the Winter Triangle.
Imaged with Nikon D70 camera, 36 mm f/2.8 ISO 500 at 5 sec. |
 |
| Fig 2 The effects of light pollution in
presence of thin cloud. Lower part of Orion. The distortion
of brighter stars images due to cloud. The light is from Kirkwall,
12 miles distant. Under such conditions pollution ifs detectable
to an altitude of over 50 arc degrees. Nikon D70, 75 mm f/1.4
ISO 500 at 5 sec.. Note the short trails of each star due to
diurnal motion. |
 |
| Fig 3 Looking south at 17h 40m December
10 2004. Constellation of Aquarius with Uranus appearing as
a 6th magnitude star. Imaged with Nikon D70 camera, 36 mm f/2.8
ISO 500 at 10 sec.. Light pollution now "normal" at
this altitude and prevailing atmospheric conditions. |
 |
| Fig 4 SWW on Dec. 10 2004 at 17h 42m. The
Milky Way in the region Cygnus, Lyra, Aquila. The bright star
top right is Vega. Star bottom left, Altair. Nikon D70 camera,
36 mm f/2.8 ISO 500 at 15 sec. |
General considerations.
If a stationary camera is set for any period of
time on a clear night with the shutter open and pointing to the
North Celestial Pole, the stars will appear as a number of small
arcs centred on Polaris. The arcs increase in length the farther
they are from the pole. The effect is, of course, the result of
the Earth's rotation.
The night sky appears vast and confusing to those
not familiar with the constellations. A programme of photographing
portions of the night sky can be instructive for the purpose of
navigating around the stars.
Camera settings.
The aim is to capture the images as quickly as
possible in order to minimize the diurnal effect noted above. Unfortunately
the majority of digital cameras are not well suited to large field
photography of the night sky. One requires a combination of a fast,
wide angle lens (24 mm* f/2.8 or better), and a shutter speed of
10 seconds or more. Nevertheless it is often possible to work on
the image at the computer in order to extend the number of stars
visible.
The camera must have a manual setting facility.
Select the widest aperture available. Choose a sensitivity selection
of 400 ISO to minimize "noise", a possibility with long
exposures. (800 ISO can be a problem from this point of view.)
Experiment on a conspicuous piece of sky such as
Orion. Try the longest exposure available to start. This may be
15 seconds. Beyond 30 seconds a camera may well have a "bulb"
setting. I would not suggest anything longer than 30 seconds exposure
except for the Milky Way.
Some of the sample images demonstrate the effects
of excessive light pollution. The colour differences between stars
are also quite apparent.
* Standard 35 mm film camera equivalent.
JV 12/12/04
Those who have had the good fortune to see the
stars and planets this autumn may have noticed Saturn making its
way eastward below Castor and Pollux. The three (Saturn is about
2.5 times brighter than Pollux) appear almost in line but the planet
is now retrograding (moving westward against the stars) and will
do so until March 31 2005.
Thereafter Saturn will move relatively quickly
into Cancer and will be in line with Castor and Pollux during July
when, of course, it will be close to the Sun in the sky.
These events signal the decline in Saturn's
position for northern observers. Not only this but the aspect of
the ring system will also begin to close. (See archives
for more details.) Saturn will remain in the constellation Cancer
throughout 2005, its declination (and hence altitude) reduced by
some 5° compared to the present year.
|