|
Annular
Eclipse of the Sun - May 31, 2003
(note: all times in GMT - add one hour for BST)
There
will be an eclipse of the Sun commencing in the early hours of 31st
May. The circumstances of the eclipse with the Moon close to apogee
(greatest distance from Earth) means that at mid-eclipse the Moon
will cover only a portion of the Sun.
Such
eclipses are referred to as "annular" (from "ring-shape")
since the visible portion of the Sun at mid-eclipse appears as a
bright ring or circle of intense light. From Orkney at the present
eclipse the form of this ring will be asymmetric, the visible portion
of the Sun appearing as a crescent (dia 1).
At
the time of sunrise in Orkney (0311 GMT) the eclipse will have been
underway 17 minutes (dia 2). Mid-eclipse occurs at 03 46.5 GMT,
when the altitude above the horizon of the Sun and Moon will be
low at 3 degrees. The eclipse ends at 04 44, by which time the Sun
will be nearly 9 degrees above the eastern horizon.
Annular
eclipses are not as important nor are they as interesting as a total
eclipse, in which the entire surface of the Sun is hidden for a
short time.
On
May 31 only 88.77% of the Sun will be obscured by the Moon at mid-eclipse;
the residual 11.23% will produce considerably more light than many,
many full Moons*. Nevertheless, more
of the Sun will be hidden from view than we experienced here in
Orkney during the great total eclipse which brushed southern Britain
in August 1999.
*The
light from the Sun is close on half a million times that of the
full Moon. However, since the Sun's light falls off close to the
limb, the proportion by which the overall brightness is diminished
at an annular eclipse is not simply the ratio of the visible area
against the entire area of the full, visible disc. Although only
a relatively small portion of the Sun will be visible, observers
should not attempt to view the event direct. The projection method
as outlined in previous articles should be adopted. For safety
reasons this will be emphasized and repeated whenever observations
involving the Sun are mentioned.
However,
because at the time of rising the Sun will be in eclipse, there
is the possibility that mist or cloud will make observing with the
unaided eye quite safe at this stage. Use discretion in such circumstances
but always err on the side of safety.
 |
| Dia.
1 Mid-eclipse 03h 46.5m GMT |
 |
| Dia.
2 Phase of the eclipse at sunrise, 03h 11m GMT |
Techniques
for observing an eclipse.
Observing
an eclipse of the Sun should be approached with caution. To look
directly at the Sun, even when most of the disc is obscured, can
be very damaging to the eyes and should not be attempted.
The
use of smoked, plain glass through which to observe the Sun direct
cannot be recommended. It was in fact the method by which I was
introduced to the subject as a child by those who knew no better.
The soot can so easily be removed by abrasion that the risks involved
are simply not worth it.
The
use of filters made for the purpose should also be checked by an
expert. In no circumstances apply such filters to a binocular
or telescope.
A
marine sextant, equipped as it is with proper filters, provides
a safe and useful way for observing the Sun in the hands of an experienced
observer. The projection method is recommended since it is not only
safer when properly set up but allows several observers to watch
the event collectively.
 |
Dia
3. Primary azimuthal points of compass: Azimuth of sunrise
(0311 GMT) on 31 May is 41.5
Note: Magnetic north is approximately 5.5 degrees west of geographical
north in 2003. When using Ordnance Survey maps also allow for
grid displacement from the meridian by referring to the notes
accompanying the map - Landranger 6 Orkney Mainland is recommended.
|
Pinhole
method.
Since
the Sun will be at a low elevation throughout the eclipse, it should
be possible to us the "pinhole" method from an eastfacing
room. Not only is this a cheap way round the problem but it also
entails the least amount of manoeuvring of apparatus.
If
you have a white wall opposite the window so much the better. The
object is to screen the window off (thick curtains will help) allowing
the Sun's light to pass through a hole of about 1 cm diameter.
Use
a large sheet of white card or paper at a distance of about 2 metres
from the hole. This should give an image of around 5 cm (2 inches)
diameter. If a wall at a greater distance can be used then the image
will be larger but fainter.
Another
method (below) will give an even larger image of the Sun.
Observing
the eclipse safely using a mirror
and piece of card
This
is a simple but effective way to observe the sun using very basic
equipment. It again works on the principle of the pinhole camera.
All you need is a good, small plain mirror (say about 3 inches x
4 inches), and piece of card thick enough to prevent sunlight from
passing through it.
Cut
a small, central hole of about ½ inch in diameter. To give
a sharp image the hole should not be any larger than this; much
smaller and your image will be too faint. You can Sellotape the
card over the face of the mirror. Of course, all the reflecting
surface must be covered except in the region of the hole.
 |
| Fig
1. Observing with "pinhole" mirror - not to scale |
The
diagram (Fig. 1) shows the arrangement. With the distance between
the mirror and the inside wall at 50 feet, the diameter of the sun's
image on the wall will be a little under 6 inches, ample to see
the eclipse. The device may be used at other times to view sunspots.
You
will need to set the thing up in advance of the eclipse to make
sure you have full control when moving the mirror to keep the image
on the wall or screen. It is not too difficult (I have used a clothes
peg to clamp the mirror to a camera tripod).
The
image will remain in position long enough for the operator to go
indoors and enjoy the eclipse on the wall: better, have a companion
and take it in turns.
Other
methods of projection.
If
you have a pair of binoculars or telescope, then you can get a much
larger and clearer image by projecting and focusing an image onto
a nearer surface (suitably screened from direct sunlight) from the
eyepiece.
 |
| Fig.
2 Using a small telescope to project the Suns image |
When
using a binocular, cover one of the main lenses so that the two
images do not overlap.
DO
NOT ALLOW CHILDREN TO CROSS THE LIGHT BEAM IN THE SET-UP ILLUSTRATED
BELOW. DO NOT OBSERVE THE REFLECTED LIGHT BEAM DIRECT. NEVER
OBSERVE THE SUN WITH A TELESCOPE OR BINOCULAR DIRECT.
Other
considerations.
In
general one is not particularly conscious of any change in the Moon's
apparent diameter as seen from Earth during the course of a lunar
month. This change is significant, however. Whereas the Sun's apparent
diameter ranges between only 31'.47 (early July) and 32'.63 (early
January), the Moon varies between 29'.73 and 33'.5. This is because
the Moon's path about the Earth is more eccentric than is the orbit
of the Earth about the Sun.
When
a full Moon occurs close to apogee its small size is readily apparent.
So also in the case of the present eclipse the "smallness"
of the Moon will be obvious: an eclipse is, in fact, the only chance
that one has of seeing the Moon at zero phase; and this raises an
interesting point.
When
the Moon is eclipsing the Sun there can be no light reaching it
from the Sun that we see other than that reflected back from the
Earth (for at this phase of the Moon the Earth appears "full"
from our natural satellite). But this earth-shine as it is called
(and readily seen when the Moon is a thin crescent - referred to
in the case of a new Moon as the old Moon in the new Moon's arms)
could not possibly contribute to our seeing the Moon at eclipse.
No, what we are observing is in fact a black object against a brilliant
background (the Sun itself). Incidentally, this is not the same
as when one observes the Gallilean satellites of Jupiter in shadow
transit.
Many
will have observed the Moon at various phases during daylight, usually
quite by chance. Hunting the new or old Moon in twilight has led
to some interesting claims that we will not go into at this time.
However, the smallest phase at which the Moon may be seen with the
unaided eye in full daylight has received less attention.
Many
remark on the Moon's apparent "largeness" when viewed
close to the horizon but fewer comment on the smallness of a full
Moon at high altitude when the Moon is close to apogee. The former
is purely a psychological "trick" on the senses. [We ignore
here the limiting effects
of refraction at moonrise (and sunrise)]. This may also be likened
to the perceived difference when one looks up as against looking
down.
Climbers
of the "Old Man of Hoy" will know the difference between
looking up at the commencement of the climb compared to looking
down from a position well short of the top! As a child in London
I had the same sensation when taken to the "Monument":
people in the cage at the top looked small enough from the ground,
but from the top looking down one had a quite different impression
of size and sense of height.
The
full Moon in summer occupies the same sections of the zodiac followed
by the Sun in winter, and vice versa. From Orkney at the summer
solstice the Sun's altitude at local noon is only 54.4º. At
this time of year a full Moon will languish in the constellation
Sagittarius where it may rise no higher than 15º above the
horizon.
A
full Moon is most apparent, therefore, in the winter months when
it spends more than twelve hours above the horizon. It is interesting
to compare incidents of full moon when close to apogee or perigee
especially in the winter months when this event takes place with
the Moon comparatively high in the sky.
The
full Moon in December 2003 occurs 32 hours following apogee and
should be seen as a typical "small Moon".
JV
|